BeyondLeads Book the working call
The working numbers

See your cost per signed case
before you spend a dollar.

Pick a product, set your budget, and watch your real ROI and cost per signed case update live. One signed case usually pays for the entire test.

Run your numbers

Your inputs

$
$10k$300k
$
%
$
$7k$25k
Average MVA settlement runs roughly $30,000 to $37,000. At a 33 to 40% contingency that is about $10,000 to $15,000 in fees per case. Drag any number to your own.

Your economics, live

Cost per signed case
$0
what you pay to acquire one signed file
Return per $1 spent
$0
in fees, before intake improvements
Leads per month
0
Signed cases per month
0
Monthly revenue in fees
$0
Net per month after spend
$0
Planning estimates from your inputs. Conversion is driven by your intake speed and follow up, not by us. Actual results vary.
Budget scenarios at your current cost and close rate
Book the working call and map your program
Every lead, fully built out

What's in every MVA lead.

Each lead includes everything your intake team needs to evaluate the case and reach out immediately, with no extra research required.

✓Full name and verified phone and email
✓Accident date, time, and location
✓Injury type and severity level
✓At fault party and police report status
✓Insurance carrier and policy info
✓Medical treatment received to date
✓No existing attorney confirmed
✓TCPA compliant consent timestamp
Why listen to us

Two words: track record.

We have spent millions in ad spend building AI powered, client intent funnels for legal cases, not generic lead forms. Our AI voice and SMS automation handles the heavy lifting while your team focuses on signing cases.

60 to 80%
contact rates, driven by instant speed to lead and smart follow up
10 to 15%
lead to signed conversion while your team focuses on qualified prospects
24/7
automation, with no missed calls, forgotten follow ups, or manual sequences
In their words

What firms tell us.

Representative feedback from personal injury and MVA firms running the program.

“
Before BeyondLeads, we were buying cheaper leads that looked good on paper but rarely turned into signed cases. The biggest shift was focusing on cost per signed case. Once we started tracking that number, the quality difference became obvious.
Managing PartnerPersonal Injury Firm, New Jersey
“
The leads came in with better intent and clearer qualification. Our intake team was not wasting the same amount of time chasing people who were confused, unresponsive, or not a fit. That alone made the process feel completely different.
Intake DirectorMVA Law Firm, Texas
“
We liked that the program was built around accountability. If a lead did not meet the criteria we agreed on, it was addressed. That gave us the confidence to test, measure, and then scale without feeling like we were taking all the risk.
OwnerPersonal Injury Practice, Florida
“
The documentation and pre qualification made a major difference for our team. We were able to move faster because we had a clearer picture of the potential case before our first real conversation with the prospect.
Operations ManagerPI Firm, Arizona
“
BeyondLeads helped us stop obsessing over the cheapest lead source and start looking at the full economics. Once we compared lead cost, intake speed, close rate, and signed case value, the better quality leads made a lot more sense.
Marketing DirectorInjury Law Firm, Georgia
“
They have consistently helped us deliver high value cases at a low cost per signed retainer. The lead quality is in a different league from the aggregators we used before.
Managing PartnerPI Firm, New Jersey
Disclosure. Testimonials and case studies shown are representative examples or composites for illustrative purposes unless otherwise noted. Individual results vary based on market, intake speed, case criteria, follow up process, and firm economics.
How firms put it to work

Five case studies, five markets.

Condensed examples of how firms structured a test around signed case economics rather than lead price.

New YorkMid sized PI firm, MVA focus

Improving intake efficiency with exclusive leads

Was buying low cost MVA leads from multiple vendors, many old, shared, or unqualified, and intake wasted time on leads that never signed. Tested an exclusive form fill program judged on cost per signed case instead of cost per lead. With fresher, exclusive, better documented leads, the team followed up faster and prioritized the strongest cases.

Takeaway: for firms with a strong intake process, paying more for exclusive, better qualified leads can beat the lowest cost per lead on signed case economics.
TexasGrowth focused firm, dedicated intake

Connecting at peak intent with live transfers

The biggest issue was speed to contact, prospects went cold before intake reached them. Tested qualified live transfers, screened before connecting to the team. Instead of chasing forms, intake spoke with prospects in real time, cut wasted follow up, and routed calls to its strongest closers with a same day sequence for unsigned but qualified prospects.

Takeaway: live transfers work best for firms with trained intake ready to answer immediately and move fast when a qualified claimant is ready to talk.
FloridaEstablished PI firm

Reducing conversion risk with signed retainers

Wanted more signed cases but was cautious about lead gen risk after inconsistent prior campaigns. Explored a signed retainer model where validated cases are reviewed before approval. Rather than relying on raw leads, the partners evaluated value, documentation, and fit before committing.

Takeaway: for firms that want less intake burden and more predictability, a signed retainer model can be more attractive than traditional pay per lead.
CaliforniaCompetitive metro firm

Cutting waste from shared lead vendors

Competing with other firms for the same prospects, many leads had already been contacted by several firms, frustrating intake and clients. Tested an exclusive model, one firm per lead, never shared or resold, with documentation and audit trail. Intake no longer had to open every call by overcoming the prospect's frustration, so conversations were cleaner and more professional.

Takeaway: in crowded markets, exclusivity can matter as much as volume, because the quality of the conversation often decides whether a prospect moves forward.
GeorgiaSmall but ambitious injury firm

Building a scalable model around cost per signed case

Limited budget, could not afford months testing low quality vendors, and needed to know if MVA lead gen made financial sense. Used the unit economics approach: average fee, cost per lead, close rate, leads per month, cost per signed case, and net monthly value. The question shifted from can we get cheaper leads to what can we afford to pay to acquire a signed case profitably, which turned marketing expense into growth investment.

Takeaway: for smaller firms, the right metric prevents bad decisions. Cost per signed case shows whether a campaign is actually working.
Your territory is open, or it is not.
We run one firm per market on a given product. In 45 minutes we map your intake, geography, and case mix to the right model and the unit economics behind it.
Book the working call